|
Operation Of The Repository
The development of the repository involves the efforts of several
individuals and organizations in a variety of roles. On this page you will find
information about the people and processes involved in creating our collection of
bio-samples for research into the causes of MS and related demyelinating
diseases.
Who Is Involved
The staff
at Accelerated Cure Project are committed to the development of
the repository as a resource for researchers investigating the causes of MS
and related demyelinating diseases. We have worked closely with the
Transverse Myelitis Association
to expand our original concept, initially focused exclusively on MS and Clinically Isolated Syndromes (CIS), to also include
TM, ADEM, NMO and ON.
As the sponsor of the repository, Accelerated Cure Project is responsible
for the design, operation and funding for the repository. We rely on our
top-notch
scientific advisory board for scientific guidance and review. The
actual specimen and data collection process is conducted at
enrolling sites across the country. In addition, we
have engaged three primary vendors,
SeraCare BioServices,
Document Solutions Group,
and Omnicare Clinical Research
to assist
us with the sample processing and storage, data management, and site
management tasks, respectively.
Design And Preparation Of The Repository
There are many effective ways to set up a repository and we are frequently asked
what steps we took in designing ours. We began with a pilot project at two
sites, Beth Israel Deaconness in Boston, MA and University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, MA.
We believed that the learning associated with going through the process on a
smaller scale would prove invaluable, and it was. Upon successful completion of the pilot, we incorporated the lessons learned into the design of the main study. This section provides a description of the choices we made in designing and setting up the repository.
Sample kit
In deciding what samples to collect, we consulted with our
scientific advisory board and other experts. The major points of
consideration were which types of samples would be most useful to the research
community and would maintain integrity during storage. We also needed to
consider the limits to the amount of blood that can be drawn from an individual
in this type of study (110 milliliters for adults 18 years and older, lesser amounts for children and adolescents).
We then worked with
SeraCare BioServices, Inc.
to further refine the kit contents and to define the
processing
and shipping procedures needed to ensure the highest quality of the samples.
For the main study, we have also built some flexibility into the kit and are
able to modify the kit composition (by adding one or more tubes) to respond
to specific research proposals.
Case report form
Our data collection instrument, the
case report form (CRF), was also
developed in consultation with our scientific advisory board. We undertook a
fairly extensive process of asking other scientists for their questionnaires,
laying all the options out, and deciding which questions made the most sense in
our context. Our pilot project helped us identify questions that were and
were not working well. In addition, from our experiences on the pilot study
which used a paper CRF, we decided to utilize electronic data capture (EDC)
in lieu of a paper CRF for the main study.
When a paper CRF is used, the study coordinator at a site interviews the subject
and fills in the answers. The CRF is then sent to a data management company
where it is scanned and checked for errors. Any errors that are found are
sent back to the site. The study coordinator then must contact the subject
to resolve the issue. It can take days, weeks or months
to get all of the issues resolved and the data "clean." EDC, however, results in cleaner data more quickly because the subject's
responses are entered in real time into a computer which has been
programmed to check the answers as they are entered.
We selected Document Solutions Group (DSG) as our
EDC vendor and have worked together to convert our paper questionnaire into
a computer based CRF. DSG has designed and implemented the software necessary
to check the subject's answers as they are entered during the interview. DSG
also performs the rest of the data management tasks associated with the
repository -- storing of all of the anonymized subject data, distribution of data upon request, and others.
Site selection
During the process of refining the kit and CRF for the main study, we started thinking
about "where" to collect the samples and data. With an initial goal of 1,000
subjects in 18 months, we decided to select between five and ten
sites, each having a sizeable patient population with MS and the related
demyelinating diseases. We documented the other requirements that a site would
have to meet in a
site information document (SID).
Once we had selected a number of potential sites, we began working with
our vendor, Omnicare Clinical Research (OCR) to
finalize the selection process and to establish budgets and letters of
agreement (LOA) with each site. Template files for the
budget
and LOA are customized for each site.
Site approval and activation
To participate in our repository, sites must receive approval to
enroll subjects and have the necessary regulatory documents in place. For example, each participating site
has had an Institutional Review Board approve the
protocol,
informed
consent form, and any additional materials given to the
subject.
Each site has also received training on the protocol, collection, and shipping
procedures from SeraCare BioServices, and on the use of the EDC system from DSG.
Site monitoring
Each
enrolling site participates in bi-weekly monitoring calls with the OCR
site monitor. During these calls, the site monitor and the study coordinator
discuss how the study is progressing at the site. They review any
personnel changes that have occurred at the site, address any factors that
are affecting the site's ability to enroll, and discuss any issues associated
with the protocol, EDC system, etc.
Recruitment And Collection Process
Pre-screening and preparation
Enrolling sites conduct a pre-screening process
by evaluating their current patients against the
inclusion/exclusion criteria and determining which of their patients
may be eligible for participation in the repository.
Those patients are approached and provided with an IRB approved copy of
the informed
consent document, a paper copy of the
case report
form and an IRB approved copy of any pre-visit
checklists
that site personnel have prepared to instruct the patient what they would need to
bring to a study visit.
Some sites also display or send out IRB approved
advertisements or flyers to attract interested potential subjects.
Informed consent
Prior to performing any study procedures, the principal investigator or study
coordinator conducts the consent process by reviewing the written form with
the subject and also giving an oral description of the procedures. Once
potential subjects have had all of their questions answered and feel as though
they fully understand what participation in the study means, they may
choose to give their consent or choose not to participate. If they do wish to
participate they must sign the informed consent form, if they can, or provide
oral consent to a witness who will then sign the form for them.
A copy of the signed informed consent form is given to the subject, a copy of
the signature page is made for Accelerated Cure Project, and the original consent
form is kept in the subject's study file.
Subject confidentiality
Each collection kit used in the repository is marked by SeraCare with a unique
alphanumeric barcode which will become the unique
identifier for a subject. All collected samples and data are marked with that
barcode in lieu of the subject's name.
In order to establish the link between the subject's identity and his/her
barcode, the study coordinator fills out a
confidential contact sheet (CCS) which documents the barcode and
the subject's contact information. This allows the subject to be
contacted in the future by the site in order to participate in the
longitudinal visits. The site makes a temporary copy of the CCS (which they
will only keep for six months) and sends the original to Accelerated Cure
Project where we keep the information in a secure location.
Because we at Accelerated Cure Project maintain the link between the subject's identity and
this original barcode, a second barcode is also generated by SeraCare for each
subject. This secondary barcode and its link to the first barcode are known
only by SeraCare and DSG personnel (who have no knowledge of the link between the
first barcode and the subject identity). The DSG system holds the link
between these two barcodes and presents the second barcode as the subject
identifier when anyone from Accelerated Cure Project logs into to the EDC
system. This prevents the stored data from ever being associated with a subject's identity.
Sample and data collection
The study coordinator uses the tubes in the collection kit (currently nine tubes that contain up to 66 ml of blood for adults) to collect blood from the subject. These tubes are marked with the subject's
barcode and date and time of draw, processed according to the
specimen handling instructions and shipped to SeraCare
for further processing and storage.
The study coordinator also interviews the subject and completes the
CRF
on the computer. During this interview, the study coordinator collects information about the subject's environmental, geographical
and medical history, demographic data, and current clinical status. All data is stored at DSG under
the assigned barcode.
If the subject is unable to complete the entire interview during that first
visit, the site can complete the interview during a
later visit, provided that a minimum subset of questions needed to characterize
the blood sample itself have been answered on the day of the blood draw. Sites are
encouraged to complete the interview with the subject as soon as possible to
minimize the need for follow-up.
During the interview, any discrepancies or errors in the entered data will
be caught by the EDC software. In addition, after the data is entered into the
system, it reviewed for completeness and correctness by OCR and Accelerated Cure Project staff.
The site coordinator next gathers all supportive diagnostic reports (MRIs,
lab reports, etc.) from the subject's medical records. These reports are anonymized at the
site, marked with the subject's barcode and sent to OCR where they are
scanned and uploaded into the EDC system.
As the last step in the data collection process, the enrolling physician completes the last several pages of the CRF which document how the subject was diagnosed with his/her disease and the results of standard clinical tests and assessments that have been performed for that subject.
Referral of relatives and others to participate
All cases are asked to refer others to the study based on
the control
hierarchy. Essentially, we seek to enroll any affected blood
relatives, any identical siblings (affected or unaffected) and then one or two
first degree blood relatives (parents, siblings, etc.). If a subject does not
have any available blood relatives to refer, he or she may be asked to refer a
closely matched unrelated friend.
When the subject's referrals are enrolled into the study, the site
coordinator fills out the
participant unit form via the EDC
system which links the subject's barcode with the barcodes of their
referrals. If any referrals also meet the case inclusion criteria of this
study, their barcodes are also entered into new PUFs so that they may then
refer their relatives and other controls.
All subjects are reimbursed a site-specific nominal amount for time,
travel, transportation, etc.
Longitudinal follow-up
Repository participants are contacted by site personnel approximately every 1-2 years for a
follow-up visit which may include additional blood draws, a new CRF interview
and/or the updating of medical status. As indicated in the informed consent,
the subject may elect to not participate in these follow-up visits.
Sample And Data Distribution
We solicit proposals requesting biological samples from
investigators studying the causes or triggers of MS and related demyelinating
diseases.
Written proposals are initially reviewed by ACP staff
for completeness, alignment with the goals of the repository, and our ability
to fulfill the request. Any issues with the proposal are conveyed to the
investigator who is given an opportunity to make changes.
The proposal is then reviewed by the repository oversight committee which assesses the proposal
against a variety of factors including the scientific merit of the application and
the potential benefit to people with MS and related diseases. The
committee then makes a recommendation regarding whether to approve the
sample request.
ACP makes a final decision on providing the samples and associated data
and communicates that decision to the investigator.
Investigators who receive samples from the repository agree to submit their
data generated from use of the specimens back to the repository for
incorporation into the sample database.
Review the
application procedure, proposal form, and sample
material transfer agreement.
Learn more about the available samples.
|